The mystery of the ÒSheela-na-gigsÒ
Indiscreet witnesses of
medieval popular belief
The rigid
morals of sexuality in Irish-catholic society have become established as a
topos in modern Irish literature. How is it, then, that we find sculptures of
female figures in seemingly rude exposed positions particularly on church
buildings all over Ireland?
When the English
biographer James Boswell visited Basel in 1764 on his Grand Tour, he made this
note in his diary: ãWolleb showed me an old papist chapel at Pont du Rhin.
Above the door there was a niche where you would have found a sculpture of the
Virign Mary in earlier days, and below this niche there were carved as a
decoration a womanÕs wide open thighs, which exposed her nakedness entirely.
She had such an offensive effect that people had mutilated her partly, but you
could still recognize the ipsa rea very well.Ò
Is it possible
that the observant English tourist came across one of those mysterious medieval
stone sculptures which are today known as ÒSheela-na-gigsÒ?
The female
sculpture mentioned by Boswell seems not to exist anymore. This is in fact not
an exception; many of the reliefs, which were certainly widely spread in
earlier days, were mutilated out of prudishness or removed entirely from their
original environment in the last one and a half centuries. Not withstanding
there are more than 150 sculptures left, some of them on the continent, the
majority on the British Isles, scattered over all regions. When in their
original place, they are mostly found on old church ruins, occasionally on
walls around cities, castles or graveyards, on fonts, gravestones or free-standing monuments and also near
holy wells.
Vulgar or sacred?
In Ireland and
Britain art-history and archaeology experts call these obscene sculptures
ÒSheela-na-gigsÒ. Sheela can be understood as a generic Irish female name. A
typical Sheela is a naked, bareheaded woman in a crouching position, who
reaches towards her vulva with one or both hands and exposes it to the
observer. Strangely enough her pudenda with the strongly emphasised genitals
contrasts sharply with her scraggy upper body and her huge bald head.
Like Boswell, the
surprised observer might not be able to reconcile religious sense of shame with
female figures who have exposed genitals - on Christian houses of God of all
places, often well visible above door or window lintels, or sometimes nearly
out of sight high up on corner stones or gables. After extensive research it
seems the discrepancy between the vulgar work of art and its sacred location is
often explained as being a Christian warning sign against carnal lust. It is
said that - like the grotesque figures found on Romanesque churches in France -
the stone sculpture wants to deliver a homily and was brought from France to
the British Isles by pilgrims or during the invasion by the Normans in the 11th
or 12th century.
Art historians
and archaeologists who think along these lines usually emphasis the repellent
effect of the sculpture which doesnÕt only embody the evil with its accentuated
sexuality (a disgrace which pillories the female sinfulness) but also scares
off evil forces. On the other side feminist scientists understand the
Sheela-na-gig as an embodied mighty Celtic goddess, which, from a
cultural-historical point of view, was kept alive by the memories of the
ancient matriarchy. In other pictures the closeness to Scandinavian, Oriental
or African fertility godesses is stressed; this would make the Sheelas relicts
of a pagan Mother-Earth-cult.
The hypothesis
regarding the French origin and the function of the sculpture as a talisman
becomes questionable after deeper research. Apart from the fact that in France,
the alleged land of origin, there are only a handful of Sheelas Ð comparable
stone figures only exist in groups, half devil, half animal or copulating Ð we
should not forget that Irish Hiberno-Romanesque-style churches often were built
on the foundations of older buildings, the remainders of which were used as
building materials. Sheelas were always carved into single stone panels and
accordingly they could be removed easily and set into walls. Often they are
found in secluded rural areas and on simple churches in villages as the only
decoration. Therefore there is no explanation why Irish stone carvers didnÕt copy
other French Christian icons.
Evidently the
Sheelas werenÕt only ornaments or emblems, but also ritual symbols. In fact
while the genitals of some of the sculptures are mutilated out of outrage
against their rudeness, they are worn down on others Ð a hint that female
church-goers or female inhabitants of the castle might have touched the
distinctive genitals while entering through the portal.
Protector of pregnant women
The Sheelas which
expose themselves in an ambivalent pose and character are a mystery: Are they
sirens or old women, witches or healers, sacred or profane females? The
characteristic discrepancy of the figures between enormous vulva and exhausted
body proves that it cannot only be about erotic lasziviousness or fertility.
What seems to be provocative and disgraceful at first sight turns out to be a
realistic portrayal of a birth process. Not only the wide open vulva refers to
this, but also Ð on some of the sculptures Ð an egg-shaped object which falls
out of the body.
In view of the
plentiful risks regarding pregnancy and birth, a high child mortality and poor
knowledge about gynaecology, many women in the middle-ages relied on
handed-down rituals in their hour of need Ð amongst them magic spells, magic
stones, charms, officinal herbs, burning of incense sticks, which were all
aiming to speed up the confinement. There is evidence until the 18th century of
the use of belts written with blessings, which were wrapped around the body of
the pregnant woman; the ÒsymbolicÒ delivery was supposed to facilitate the
birth process. In fact there are some Sheela-na-gigs wearing such a belt.
But why the ugly
head and the exhausted body? All over Europe pregnant women made figures
of tutelary spirits or popular
deities, whose names can be translated as Òspiritual forbearÒ, ÒgrandmotherÒ,
Òbareheaded old womanÒ or Òold Mother EarthÒ. The incantation of the forebear
indicates a dialogue with preceding generations, from whom the delivering woman
was expecting support. Today the second part of the German word for mid-wife,
ÒHeb-ammeÒ, still reminds one of the German word for forbear, Ò-ahneÒ. With its
division into Òlife-givingÒ lower body and ÒdyingÒ upper body the Sheela
symbolizes exactly this dialogue; not without reason she often overlooks a graveyard
from her position up on the church wall. Even though the church in the Middle
Ages would have undoubtedly prefered if the pregnant woman, like in Pont du
Rhin, had prayed to the Mother of God, for a long time they failed to eliminate
the deep-rooted popular belief and the linked popular customs. So they
tolerated the Sheela-na-gigs in sacred locations, to get the rural population
attached to the Christian church.
Article from ãDie ZeitÒ, 28th November 2000
Original text by Barbara Freitag and Hans-Christian Oeser
Translation by Sandra Schmid, wordsmithoffice@eircom.net